SBOM Studio

An SBOM management platform where the immutable commit is the compliance artifact. It records Product Release SBOMs as immutable commits, shows every component enriched with supply chain intelligence and the vulnerabilities that affect them, and controls who receives the published one.

Yes, because generating was never the hard part. Most teams already generate SBOMs, then park them in a repository, a shared drive or SharePoint and never look at what is inside them again. The file exists, the risk it describes goes unread.

SBOM Studio understands the anatomy of every component in the SBOM, continuously enriches that component data, and tracks the vulnerabilities that may affect each and every one of them. You choose which projects you want monitored, and Cybeats rechecks them every hour. That is what an SBOM system of record adds.

Yes, and the difference is the data, not the feature list. Dependency-Track is an OWASP open source platform that ingests CycloneDX and matches components against public vulnerability sources. SBOM Studio ingests CycloneDX and SPDX, then does the work that makes supplier data usable: Quality Analysis flags issues in the component data you were sent, and Autocorrection repairs SBOMs that would otherwise be unusable.

Every component is then enriched from the Cybeats data lake with supply chain intelligence, and the whole thing is built to run at enterprise scale across thousands of Product Release SBOMs, with controlled sharing of each published one.

A commit generates CycloneDX 1.6 and 1.7 and SPDX 2.3 and 3.0.1. The ingestion range is wider, CycloneDX 1.2 through 1.7 and SPDX 2.2 through 3.0.1, so older supplier files still load.

A supplier who sends a component list as a CSV or an Excel sheet is not a dead end either. csv2cdx, the open source converter Cybeats builds and maintains, turns that spreadsheet into a valid CycloneDX SBOM you can ingest like any other. For the formats and data fields the EU CRA expects, see EU CRA SBOM requirements.

Quality Analysis flags it, and Autocorrection repairs it. Quality Analysis reports issues in the component data an SBOM provides, and the Autocorrection repair modules Cybeats built over years let the platform ingest SBOMs that would otherwise be unusable. Studio and Consumer share both.

Update an SBOM with every build or release, and revise it to correct any errors, as CISA's 2026 minimum elements recommend. SBOM Studio lets you update your Product SBOM as often as you need: every version is an immutable commit, nothing reaches customers until you publish it, and granular controls decide what each customer can access, from downloading the Product SBOM and VEX to view-only.

Generate it on demand and publish it as a separate file paired with the Product Release SBOM. The SBOM is immutable and says what the product contains. The VEX says which of those vulnerabilities are actually exploitable.

A VEX document is only correct as of the moment it was created. A new vulnerability can be reported minutes after you generate one, which is why VEX has to be treated as dynamic rather than a static artifact you file once and forget. SBOM Studio generates VEX on demand, and imports VEX from suppliers.

Look up the CVE and SBOM Studio returns the product releases that ship the affected component. Every component in every monitored project associated with your product releases is matched against vulnerability intelligence, so you get specific products and versions back instead of a manual cross-reference.

Through the SBOM Studio Sharing Portal, not an email attachment. Once an SBOM leaves as a file, you lose control of who has it, who forwards it and who read it. In the Sharing Portal, authenticated customers see only the published Product SBOMs you grant them, and granular controls decide whether each one can download the SBOM, see vulnerabilities and download VEX, or view only. Access is revocable at any time, and every action is logged.

For machine to machine exchange, support for the Transparency Exchange API, the OWASP specification being standardized in Ecma TC54, is at proof-of-concept stage.

Yes, for cyber devices. Section 524B(b)(3) of the FD&C Act requires manufacturers to provide an SBOM covering commercial, open source, and off-the-shelf software components. FDA's February 2026 premarket guidance also asks for each component's level of support and end-of-support date.

The same way you manage an SBOM, with AI models and datasets in the catalog. SBOM Studio ingests AIBOMs in CycloneDX or SPDX, including files from the OWASP AIBOM Generator, then monitors and shares them under the same controls.

Yes, both, so the software, AI, cryptographic and hardware inventory of every product lives in one platform instead of four. HBOM has dedicated hardware and driver catalogs, and CBOM a dedicated catalog for cryptographic assets.

A Cryptography Bill of Materials inventories the algorithms and keys a product uses, so you can find what is exposed to post-quantum risk before you have to migrate it. A Hardware Bill of Materials covers the chips, radios and processors the product runs on.

Magic Link helps complete an SBOM by adding the open source packages it is missing with nothing more than a package link. Paste a link from npm, Maven, PyPI, GitHub or ten other package sources, and it fetches the name, manufacturer, supplier and available versions, then adds your chosen version to the Package Catalog or a software version. Cybeats enrichment fills in missing fields where data exists, such as licenses, CPEs, hashes and end-of-life dates, and you see known vulnerabilities by severity, so you can assess a package at the design stage, before you build with it.