SBOM Studio

An SBOM management platform where the immutable commit is the compliance artifact. It records Product Release SBOMs as immutable commits, shows every component enriched with supply chain intelligence and the vulnerabilities that affect them, and controls who receives the published one.

Yes, because generating was never the hard part. Most teams already generate SBOMs, then park them in a repository, a shared drive or SharePoint and never look at what is inside them again. The file exists, the risk it describes goes unread.

SBOM Studio understands the anatomy of every component in the SBOM, continuously enriches that component data, and tracks the vulnerabilities that may affect each and every one of them. You choose which projects you want monitored, and Cybeats rechecks them every hour. That is what an SBOM system of record adds.

Yes, and the difference is the data, not the feature list. Dependency-Track is an OWASP open source platform that ingests CycloneDX and matches components against public vulnerability sources. SBOM Studio ingests CycloneDX and SPDX, then does the work that makes supplier data usable: Quality Analysis flags issues in the component data you were sent, and Autocorrection repairs SBOMs that would otherwise be unusable.

Every component is then enriched from the Cybeats data lake with supply chain intelligence, and the whole thing is built to run at enterprise scale across thousands of Product Release SBOMs, with controlled sharing of each published one.

A commit generates CycloneDX 1.6 and 1.7 and SPDX 2.3 and 3.0.1. The ingestion range is wider, CycloneDX 1.2 through 1.7 and SPDX 2.2 through 3.0.1, so older supplier files still load.

A supplier who sends a component list as a CSV or an Excel sheet is not a dead end either. csv2cdx, the open source converter Cybeats builds and maintains, turns that spreadsheet into a valid CycloneDX SBOM you can ingest like any other. For the formats and data fields the EU CRA expects, see EU CRA SBOM requirements.

Quality Analysis flags it, and Autocorrection repairs it. Quality Analysis reports issues in the component data an SBOM provides, and the Autocorrection repair modules Cybeats built over years let the platform ingest SBOMs that would otherwise be unusable. Studio and Consumer share both.

Every build or release, and again when the data changes. CISA's 2026 minimum elements say each software version or update should have an associated SBOM, and that a corrected error calls for a revised one. A Product Release SBOM can carry several immutable commits, with exactly one published.

Generate it on demand and publish it as a separate file paired with the Product Release SBOM. The SBOM is immutable and says what the product contains. The VEX says which of those vulnerabilities are actually exploitable.

A VEX document is only correct as of the moment it was created. A new vulnerability can be reported minutes after you generate one, which is why VEX has to be treated as dynamic rather than a static artifact you file once and forget. SBOM Studio generates VEX on demand, and imports VEX from suppliers.

Look up the CVE and SBOM Studio returns the product releases that ship the affected component. Every component in every monitored project associated with your product releases is matched against vulnerability intelligence, so you get specific products and versions back instead of a manual cross-reference.

Through the SBOM Studio sharing portal, not an email attachment. Once an SBOM leaves as a file you lose the ability to say who has it, to withdraw it, or to prove who read it. The portal keeps that control: you decide who receives which SBOM and which VEX, each customer sees only their own products, access is revocable, and every access is logged.

For machine to machine exchange, Studio can serve the same SBOM and VEX over the Transparency Exchange API, the OWASP specification being standardized in Ecma TC54.

Yes, for cyber devices. Section 524B(b)(3) of the FD&C Act requires manufacturers to provide an SBOM covering commercial, open source, and off-the-shelf software components. FDA's February 2026 premarket guidance also asks for each component's level of support and end-of-support date.

The same way you manage an SBOM, with AI models and datasets in the catalog. SBOM Studio ingests AIBOMs in CycloneDX or SPDX, including files from the OWASP AIBOM Generator, then monitors and shares them under the same controls.

Yes, both, managed in the same catalog as your SBOMs. A Cryptography Bill of Materials inventories the cryptographic algorithms and keys a product uses, which is how you identify the assets exposed to post-quantum risk before you have to migrate them. A Hardware Bill of Materials covers the layer underneath: the chips, radios and processors the product runs on.

Studio manages all four bills of materials, SBOM, AIBOM, CBOM and HBOM, under the same enrichment, monitoring and sharing controls, so the software, AI, cryptographic and hardware inventory for a product sit in one place rather than four.

Paste a package manager or GitHub URL and Magic Link builds the component for you. It analyzes the source, creates the component in your catalog, and adds it to the product or project you choose. It also enriches incomplete component data and helps build Design SBOMs.